Transport carbon emissions


Scientists warn that green flights not in easy reach.

Scientists warn that guilt-free flying is still a long way off, despite your hopes for the future.

The development of environmentally friendly and less polluting jet fuels is essential to climate-friendly aviation strategies.

The government’s goal of flying “jet zero” by 2050 also requires switching to sustainable fuel.

However, the Royal Society comes to the conclusion that there is currently no clear alternative to conventional fuel.

Sustainable fuels would play a crucial role in reaching the 2050 goal, according to the UK airlines’ trade association.

2.4% of global emissions of greenhouse gases and 8% of UK emissions are caused by flying. These gases warm the air, adding to an Earth-wide temperature boost and environmental change.

Governments and the aviation industry are experimenting with ways to lessen the negative effects of traditional kerosene fuel on the environment in response to rising flight demand.

The Royal Society report examined four greener fuel alternatives to replace the 12.3 million tonnes of jet fuel used annually in the UK.

It came to the conclusion that no alternative could soon replace fossil jet fuel.

Biofuel, largely derived from crops, is now used by some airlines in very small quantities. Biofuels are used by London Heathrow Airport the most, but they only make up 0.5 percent of the airport’s fuel.

According to the Royal Society, producing enough to meet the needs of the UK aviation industry would require half of the country’s agricultural land, putting pressure on food supplies.

One more choice is fuel produced using hydrogen created with green power. However, there is currently insufficient renewable electricity generation in the UK to produce sufficient green hydrogen.

The inability of existing aircraft engines to run on hydrogen-based fuel is yet another significant obstacle.

Ammonia and synthetic fuels are also being considered, but it’s not clear if existing aircraft could use them because they require even more green hydrogen.

According to the authors, it is still not clear exactly how much each alternative fuel would reduce flying’s impact on the environment.

Yet, they stress that in the drawn out a fruitful elective fuel will presumably be grown, yet that planes and air terminals should be re-planned.

They suggest that the UK could become a global leader if it invested in finding a solution to the issue and are calling for additional research into sustainable aviation fuel.

According to them, a new fuel needs to be able to be used worldwide, be safe, and have a high enough energy density to fly long distances.

The exchange body for UK aircrafts, Carriers UK, said accordingly that maintainable energizes were protected and progressively typical, and that the area was focused on the 2050 ‘stream zero’ target.

“There is no magic bullet, but by modernising airspace to make flying more efficient, by introducing new zero emission technology like hydrogen aircraft and by upscaling the use of sustainable aviation fuels this decade, it can be achieved,” it said in a statement.

As to Illustrious Society’s affirmation that adequately providing the UK avionics industry with manageable fills would come down on food supplies, Aircrafts UK said the UK had adequate feedstocks, that they would be drawn at first from family, business, agrarian and ranger service endlessly squander modern gases, and that they didn’t rival food crops.

“Decarbonising aviation is undoubtedly a challenge, and the sector is working closely with government on ways to accelerate the transition and maximise both the environmental and huge economic opportunities from leading the ‘jet zero’ transition,”Airlines UK said.

Natural campaigners say the public authority should likewise urge individuals to fly less.

“Not all aspects of modern life in Western nations have an easy ‘technofix’ for the damage they do to the environment, and nowhere is this truer than for air travel,” suggests Leo Murray, director of innovation at climate charity Possible.

His association believes that the public authority should burden regular customers, the modest number of individuals who take around 70% of departures from UK air terminals.

“A Frequent Flyer Levy would target reduced demand amongst the group responsible for most of the environmental damage today, while leaving the annual family holiday untouched,” he says.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “The UK’s Sustainable Aviation Fuels programme is one of the most comprehensive in the world. Sustainable Aviation Fuels and Hydrogen are key elements of this, and we will ensure that there is no impact on food crops.”



At Natural World Fund, we are passionate about stopping the decline in our wildlife.

The declines in our wildlife is shocking and frightening. Without much more support, many of the animals we know and love will continue in their declines towards extinction.

When you help to restore a patch of degraded land through rewilding to forests, meadows, or wetlands, you have a massive impact on the biodiversity at a local level. You give animals a home and food that they otherwise would not have had, and it has a positive snowball effect for the food chain.

We are convinced that this is much better for the UK than growing lots of fast-growing coniferous trees, solely to remove carbon, that don’t actually help our animals to thrive.

This is why we stand for restoring nature in the UK through responsible rewilding. For us, it is the right thing to do. Let’s do what’s right for nature!

Support our work today at and join in the solution!


Leave A Comment